If you decide to combine these two concepts, it is important that you cover all of your required topics in a systematic way. Open University Press; Here are some quzlitative the common mistakes people make when writing their discussion section: Author information Article notes Copyright and License information Disclaimer.

Department of English Writing Guide.

The discussion section is often considered the most important part of your research paper because this is where you: Make Suggestions for Further Research. Two different approaches can be formulated on this issue? You should refer back to your introduction and establish if what you found was consistent with the existing literature, or if it was somewhat unexpected or controversial. However, do not offer recommendations which could have been easily addressed within the study.

Which target journal should be selected? Besides, talents, skills, and experiences of the researchers in different fields ie. Following receival of the opinions of internal, and external referees, one should concentrate priorly on indicated problems, and their solutions. The objectives of your discussion section should include the following: Received Feb 12; Accepted Apr 2.

It explains your findings and interprets them in context of previous work, as well as provides some qualitativf for future research. If a study that you cited does not support your findings, don’t ignore it–clearly explain why your research findings differ from theirs.


Relate the Findings to Similar Studies No study in the doscussion sciences is so novel or possesses such a restricted focus that it has absolutely no relation go previously published research. What are the common mistakes made in writing the Discussion section?: Comments coming from the reviewers should be criticized, but a defensive attitude should not be assumed during this evaluation process.

For the placement of references use of software programs detailed in other sections is a rational approach.

How to write a discussion section?

Each paragraph should resesrch contain more than words, and hence words should be counted repeteadly. General Rules These are the general rules you should adopt when composing your discussion of the results: It is also one of the most difficult parts to write, and sometimes the longest. A Guide for preparing manuscript submitted to biomedical journals. Please review our privacy policy. Indeed, editors of the journal recommend use of active voice so as to increase the intelligibility of the manuscript.

How to write a discussion section?

Briefly reiterate the research problem or problems you are investigating and the methods you reseearch to investigate them, then move quickly to describe the major findings of the study.

Don’t Write Two Results Sections! As qualitwtive, you should always approach the selection and interpretation of your findings introspectively and to think critically about the possibility of judgmental biases unintentionally entering into discussions about the significance of your work.


On the other hand in the last paragraph, future directions or potential clinical applications may be emphasized. In conclusion, academic writing is similar to other skills, and practice makes perfect.

Previously, similar articles might have been published, however innovative messages, and new perspectives on the relevant subject will facilitate acceptance of the article for publication.

External referees are our colleagues who did not contribute to data collection of our study in any way, but hhow can request their opinions about the subject matter of the manuscript. Fundamental advantage of this approach is to gain a habit of making academic researches if one complies with the designated time schedule, and to keep the manuscript writing motivation at persistently high levels.

Academic Writing No Comments.