Three to six keywords that encapsulate the main topics of the research will have been drawn from the body of the article. Are appropriate descriptive or inferential statistics presented? Are the suggestions for future action based on practical significance or on statistical.
Unfortunately this is not always the case.
The goal of this activity is to give you an opportunity to apply whatever you learned in this course in evaluating a research paper. Is the review comprehensive?
Are the tables and figures if any well organized and easy to understand? What type of research is this? If parametric tests were used, is there evidence that the researcher avoided violating the. In your own words what methods and procedures were used? Main findings brief summary of the aricle Discussion This should show insight into the meaning and significance of the research findings.
There were any major omissions in the results, which could indicate bias Percentages have been used to disguise small sample sizes The data generated is consistent with the data collected Negative results are just as relevant as research that produces positive results but as mentioned previously may be omitted in publication due to editorial bias. If a pilot study was conducted, are its execution and results described as well as its impact on the subsequent study?
Are recommendations for future action made? This will demonstrate how to critique a literature review article the study is capable of achieving its aims.
She has written for a variety of online websites and blogs, but particularly enjoys focusing on health education and psychosocial issues.
Have the references been critically analyzed and the results of various studies compared and contrasted, i. If a sample was selected, is the method of selecting the sample clearly described? Is the educational significance of the problem discussed? Grading criteria for research critique In your summary, you should identify main elements of the research including 1.
How to Critique a Research Article
Are the data in each table and figure described in the text? Did the researcher discuss or account for any potentially confounding variables that he or she was unable to control for? Are the control procedures described? Is evidence presented that indicates that each instrument is appropriate rveiew the sample under study?
Are most of the sources primary, i. Review of Related Literature. Are generalizations consistent with the results? Discussion Conclusions and Recommendation 1.
However, this activity is unique because you evaluate a research article from a methodology perspective. Did the researcher avoid the use of volunteers? Things to consider in this section are:.
How to Critique a Research Article | Ausmed
However, you should address revie questions as you are writing your critique part. What were the strengths and weaknesses of the study? When necessary, are variables directly or operationally defined?